Search results: 355
This course takes you through all the things you need to know in order to use the 2000FX TEM, from the principles of its operation and where different controls are found, to the alignments needed to get good data.
There is a quiz at the end of the course and you will need to pass this test before progressing to hands-on training.
There is an accompanying lecture, held once a term, to give more context and detail.
There is also a booklet describing the different alignments that you should have received in the email notifying you that you are on this course. It can be downloaded from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/physics/research/condensedmatt/microscopy/em-rtp/training.
The Science of Music module (IL016) aims to introduce students (in all subject areas and with any level of musical, mathematical or scientific expertise) to the relationships between science, music and mathematics. The module will explore multiple facets of Music by combining tools from a variety of disciplines, from Physics and Maths to Psychology and History, with contributions from a range of professional musicians.Link opens in a new window
Teaching for the module will be based around 9 2-hour workshops and a field trip (on a Saturday mid-February) to Royal Birmingham Conservatoire.
Lecturer: Christian Boehning
Term(s): Term 1
Status for Mathematics students: List A for Mathematics
Commitment: 30 lectures plus weekly worksheets
Assessment: The weekly worksheets carry 15% assessed credit; the remaining 85% credit by 2-hour examination.
Prerequisites: None, but an understanding of MA125 Introduction to Geometry will be helpful.
Leads To: Third and fourth year courses in Algebra and Geometry, including: MA3D9 Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, MA3E1 Groups and Representations, MA4A5 Algebraic Geometry, MA4E0 Lie Groups, MA473 Reflection Groups, MA4H4 Geometric Group Theory, MA448 Hyperbolic Geometry and others
Content: Geometry is the attempt to understand and describe the world around us and all that is in it; it is the central activity in many branches of mathematics and physics, and offers a whole range of views on the nature and meaning of the universe.
Klein's Erlangen program describes geometry as the study of properties invariant under a group of transformations. Affine and projective geometries consider properties such as collinearity of points, and the typical group is the full matrix group. Metric geometries, such as Euclidean geometry and hyperbolic geometry (the non-Euclidean geometry of Gauss, Lobachevsky and Bolyai) include the property of distance between two points, and the typical group is the group of rigid motions (isometries or congruences) of 3-space. The study of the group of motions throws light on the chosen model of the world.
Aims: To introduce students to various interesting geometries via explicit examples; to emphasize the importance of the algebraic concept of group in the geometric framework; to illustrate the historical development of a mathematical subject by the discussion of parallelism.
Objectives: Students at the end of the module should be able to give a full analysis of Euclidean geometry; discuss the geometry of the sphere and the hyperbolic plane; compare the different geometries in terms of their metric properties, trigonometry and parallels; concentrate on the abstract properties of lines and their incidence relation, leading to the idea of affine and projective geometry.
Books:
M Reid and B Szendröi, Geometry and Topology, CUP, 2005 (some Chapters will be available from the General office).
E G Rees, Notes on Geometry, Springer
HSM Coxeter, Introduction to Geometry, John Wiley & Sons
Aims: To develop further and to continue the study of linear algebra, which was begun in Year 1.
To point out and briefly discuss applications of the techniques developed to other branches of mathematics, physics, etc.
Objectives: By the end of the module students should be familiar with: the theory and computation of the the Jordan canonical form of matrices and linear maps; bilinear forms, quadratic forms, and choosing canonical bases for these; the theory and computation of the Smith normal form for matrices over the integers, and its application to finitely generated abelian groups.
Lecturer: Christian Böhning
Term(s): Term 2
Status for Mathematics students: List C
Commitment: 30 lectures plus assignments
Assessment: Assignments (15%), 3 hour written exam (85%).
Prerequisites:
A background in algebra (especially MA249 Algebra II) is essential. The module develops more specialised material in commutative algebra and in geometry from first principles, but MA3G6 Commutative Algebra will be useful. More than technical prerequisites, the main requirement is the sophistication to work simultaneously with ideas from several areas of mathematics, and to think algebraically and geometrically. Some familiarity with projective geometry (e.g. from MA243 Geometry) is helpful, though not essential.
Leads To:
A first module in algebraic geometry is a basic requirement for study in geometry, number theory or many branches of algebra or mathematical physics at the MSc or PhD level. Many MA469 projects are on offer involving ideas from algebraic geometry.
Content:
Algebraic geometry studies solution sets of polynomial equations by geometric methods. This type of equations is ubiquitous in mathematics and much more versatile and flexible than one might as first expect (for example, every compact smooth manifold is diffeomorphic to the zero set of a certain number of real polynomials in R^N). On the other hand, polynomials show remarkable rigidity properties in other situations and can be defined over any ring, and this leads to important arithmetic ramifications of algebraic geometry.
Methodically, two contrasting cross-fertilizing aspects have pervaded the subject: one providing formidable abstract machinery and striving for maximum generality, the other experimental and computational, focusing on illuminating examples and forming the concrete geometric backbone of the first aspect, often uncovering fascinating phenomena overlooked from the bird's eye view of the abstract approach.
In the lectures, we will introduce the category of (quasi-projective) varieties, morphisms and rational maps between them, and then proceed to a study of some of the most basic geometric attributes of varieties: dimension, tangent spaces, regular and singular points, degree. Moreover, we will present many concrete examples, e.g., rational normal curves, Grassmannians, flag and Schubert varieties, surfaces in projective three-space and their lines, Veronese and Segre varieties etc.
Books:
- Atiyah M.& Macdonald I. G., Introduction to commutative algebra, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA (1969)
- Harris, J., Algebraic Geometry, A First Course, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 133, Springer-Verlag (1992)
- Mumford, D., Algebraic Geometry I: Complex Projective Varieties, Classics in Mathematics, reprint of the 1st ed. (1976); Springer-Verlag (1995)
- Reid, M., Undergraduate Algebraic Geometry, London Math. Soc. Student Texts 12, Cambridge University Press (2010)
- Shafarevich, I.R., Basic Algebraic Geometry 1, second edition, Springer-Verlag (1994)
- Zariski, O. & Samuel, P., Commutative algebra, Vol. II, Van Nos- trand, New York (1960)
This is the third module in the Warwick algebraic topology sequence.
The abelian group structure on homology is upgraded via dualization to a natural ring structure on cohomology. This additional structure makes cohomology a more powerful invariant than homology. Cohomology is also a more natural invariant in many contexts, and various cohomology theories play a key role in a number of fields, including differential geometry, mathematical physics, algebraic geometry, and number theory, among others.
Poincaré duality is a relation
between the homology and cohomology of an oriented manifold. The ring
structure of cohomology plays a critical role in its proof.
The two laboratory mini-projects conclude your MSc year and prepare you for your PhD projects. MD979 is the first one. Due to the highly inter-disciplinary nature of the IBR DTP, you have a great variety of choice for these projects. You will have an 11-week period for each of the two mini-project modules (MD979 and the subsequent MD980). Normally there would be one experimental biology project and one either theoretical biology project (e.g., bioinformatics, computational biology) or experimental project in chemistry, physics or engineering. The supervisor pool is accordingly expanded to include colleagues across the departments of the Faculty of Science in addition to WMS.
The projects will either be developed by the you together with an academic from the supervisor pool, or initially by the supervisors alone, who will submit projects directly to the mini-project call for presentation to the student cohort at a mini-project “fair”. You should be aware that all projects will first be vetted in the IBR DTP management team before inclusion in the course.
The modules Research Topics in Interdisciplinary Biomedical Research [MD978] and Laboratory Project 1 [MD979] are a pre-requisite for this module.
Students will undertake two laboratory projects in two different disciplines. In most cases, this will be a biology-focused project and one in either chemistry, physics, mathematics, engineering or computer science. If you are a student on the Quantitative Imaging programme, your projects should focus on imaging and image analysis. Projects can be undertaken in WMS or a department within the Faculty of Science at Warwick.
Students are encouraged to develop a project proposal together with a member of staff from the supervisor pool (www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/med/study/mrcdtp/supervisorsandprojects/). In addition, the supervisor pool will be invited to submit potential projects for consideration by the IBR DTP management committee. Projects will be reviewed for fit to the scientific brief and will be then offered to the students. The final choice of project will be made by the student in consultation with the MSc Director.
The Physical Biology of the Cell module is a core module of the MSc IBR, which underpins the MRC-funded IBR DTP.
The module aims to provide a physical sciences perspective to cellular biology and equip postgraduate students to begin a research career at the interface of biology and physics.
You will explore the basic physical concepts underlying the behaviour of biomolecules, dynamic cell processes, cellular structure and signalling events. You will learn how to estimate sizes, speed and energy requirements for a variety of biological processes and build simple explicit models to fit experimental data from cell biological experiments.
PBoC is about learning to ask and answer quantitative scientific questions in the realm of biophysical cell biology.
It is arguably possible to sask scientific questions that are not quantitative*, but in general, useful scientific ideas make quantitative predictions that can be tested by observation and experiment. And arguably again, the most powerful scientific ideas are those that make the firmest quantitative predictions, and can thereby be definitively disproved.
Our goal with this course is to equip you with a basic set of tools to think quantitatively about the biological world, design better (more incisive) experiments, and analyse and interpret your data in useful and formally correct ways.
On completing the module, you should be able to analyse and quantify physical biological properties and behaviours of living systems; formulate scientific questions by harnessing the core concepts of physical biology and design experiments that effectively address your scientific questions.
PBoC is designed
to help you to think! Your instructors will aim to make the
material challenging, but accessible, and above all, interesting.
Timing and CATS
The module will run in the Spring Term and is worth 15 CATS
Module Description
The module introduces thinkers, ideas and arguments from ancient philosophy that have been foundational for the western philosophical tradition. Thinkers studied include Parmenides, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Students are introduced both to the primary texts and to secondary literature. The module focuses specifically on metaphysics, epistemology and ethics, and emphasizes contrast and continuity between treatments of these topics in the ancient literature. The module provides a foundation both for further study of Greek philosophy, and for study of contemporary philosophical literature that engages with these traditional themes.
Learning Outcomes or Aims
By the end of the module students should have acquired: 1. a good basic knowledge and understanding of the work of some of the key figures in Ancient Greek philosophy; 2. an appreciation of the development of philosophical thought about metaphysics, epistemology and ethics in Ancient Greece, and an ability to compare the views of key thinkers on specific topics; 3. an appreciation of the importance of Ancient Greek philosophy in the history of Western philosophy as a whole; 4. skills in reading and interpreting philosophical texts; 5. an ability to critically assess relevant arguments; 6. an ability to construct and present a lucid and rigorous argument, both orally and in writing; 7. the ability to discuss a topic in a pair or a group with clarity, patience and sensitivity to the views of others.
Contact Time
In this module students must attend 2 hours of lectures and 1 hour of seminars per week, over the course of 10 weeks
Lectures for 2017-18
- Monday 12pm to 1pm in L5
- Wednesday 11am to 12pm in LIB2
There will be no lectures in reading week (week 6)
Seminars for 2017-18
Seminars start in week 2 and run for the rest of the term
There will be no seminars in reading week (week 6)
Please sign up for a seminar group using Tabula.
Assessment Methods
This module is formally assessed in the following ways:
- 1 x 1,500 word essay (worth 15% of the module)
- 1 x 2-hour exam (worth 85% of the module)
Plato and Descartes (PH145-15)
What would you do if you had a magic ring that made you invisible, and which guaranteed that, whatever you did, you’d go unnoticed? Perhaps you’d spend your time like an invisible superhero, striking from nowhere to trip up bag-snatchers, using your power to expose criminal conspiracies by companies to use child slaves to make their products, or to dump toxic waste in rivers? If you did do things like this, would it bother you that no one ever gave you even the tiniest bit of credit, or even acknowledged that it was you that had done all of that? On the other hand, with the power of invisibility and a guarantee that you would never get caught, you could take what you wanted from anyone, at any time, anywhere. And you wouldn’t have to fear punishment, or shame, or retribution. What would you do?
In the Republic, Plato uses this question, and others like it, to help us think about what justice amounts to, and why we should be just. His profound answers to these questions, as well as his further claims about how to organize society in a way that promotes justice, are at the foundation of the discipline of philosophy. We will think and argue with Plato on the way to considering our own answers to these questions.
What do you now know most certainly of all? Perhaps you take yourself to know that there is a computer screen in front of you because you can see one? Or, perhaps you can take yourself to know that a car alarm is going off outside because you can hear one? Most of the things we know with certainty appear to come to us through the senses; through sight, smell and touch. But does all of our knowledge about the world come to us through the senses? Suppose that there was a powerful evil demon who has brought it about that the experiences that you are having now are all radically misleading about the real world. There is no computer, no cup of coffee on the desk, and no walls that surround you, even though it appears that there are. If all of the evidence of the senses cannot be trusted, is there anything at all that you are able to know in these circumstances? If so, how?
In the Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes uses an exercise of this kind to argue that it is possible to arrive at truths about the world independent of the use of the senses, simply through reasoning and reflection. This is an idea that places Descartes squarely in the Platonic tradition. But Descartes also combines his Platonism with the worldview of the new physics. What reason reveals—according to Descartes—is that the world is very different from the way it appears, lacking colour, taste, smell and sound, and composed only of extended stuff. Is he right?